JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 23, 2011Full bench

C-101 de 2011

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Julio Cesar Lopez Espinosa·Respondent Decreto Ley 1042 De 1978 Aparte Del Articulo 1o.

✓
Topic · hard data
Fallo Inhibitorio Por Ineptitud De Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Facultades Extraordinarias Para Modificar Escalas De Remuneracion, Clasificacion, Nomenclatura De Empleos Y Dictar Otras Disposiciones En Materia De Administracion
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto Ley 1042 de 1978.

Demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra un aparte de su artículo 1º.

La norma establece el sistema de nomenclatura y clasificación de los empleos de los ministerios, departamentos administrativos, superintendencias, establecimientos públicos y unidades administrativas especiales del orden nacional.

El aparte acusado es el siguiente: ….. del orden nacional …… El demandante considera que el aparte subrayado vulnera el artículo 13 de la Constitución Política y solicita se declare su inexequibilidad.

La Corte determina que existe una ineptitud sustancial de la demanda para emitir un pronunciamiento de fondo, por lo tanto decide declararse INHIBIDA

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1042/78. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 1Decreto 1042/78DECLINED TO RULE
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declararse INHIBIDA, para emitir pronunciamiento de fondo respecto del cargo formulado contra la expresión "del orden nacional", contenida en el artículo 1º del Decreto Ley 1042 de 1978, por ineptitud sustancial de la demanda.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentLuis Ernesto Vargas Silva
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.