JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 17, 2001

T-394 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Larry Diaz Santamaria Vs. Alcaldia Municipal De Buenavista Cordoba

✓
Topic · hard data
Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Solicitud Pago De Salarios Adeudados. Procedencia De La Tutela Para El Pago De Salario. Derecho Fundamental. Prueba De La Situacion Critica Economica Y Psicologica Y Valoracion Del Perjuicio Irremediable. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho Al Minimo Vital
  • Prueba directa o indirecta de situación económica y psicológica
Acción De Tutela
  • Inexistencia de perjuicio irremediable
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de salarios
Salario
  • Sumas que deben integrarse para efectos del significado y pago oportuno
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia de segunda instancia proferida por la Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo -Seccion Segunda, Subseccion A- del Consejo de Estado el 26 de octubre de 2000, dentro del proceso radicado bajo el No. AC 12.286, que revoco el fallo de primera instancia proferido por el Tribunal Administrativo de Cordoba el 22 de agosto de 2000, dentro del proceso de tutela promovido por el senor Larry Diaz Santamaria.
  2. Segundo. LIBRESE por Secretaria la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.