JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 1, 2000

T-652 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Armando Ramirez Arciniegas

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital Y Trabajo. Mora En El Pago De Salarios. Hospital Federico Lleras. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Remuneracion Minima Vital Y Movil
  • No debe limitarse protección a retribución mínima del trabajo
Accion De Tutela Transitoria Para Reclamo De Salarios
  • Prueba requerida de que existe perjuicio irremediable
Derecho Al Minimo Vital
  • Pago oportuno de salarios
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia objeto de revision y en su lugar ORDENAR que el Director del Hospital Federico Lleras Acosta de Ibague, si es que no lo han hecho, pague los salarios pendientes al accionante Armando Ramirez Arciniegas y que comprenden los meses debidos y relacionados en la respectiva peticion, todo ello en un termino de cinco dias, siguientes a la notificacion del presente fallo. Y, PREVENIR para que en adelante no se vuelva a incurrir en dilaciones que demoren el pago del salario del accionante y no se lo denigre por el hecho de reclamar judicialmente.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria librense las comunicaciones previstas en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.