JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 22, 1995

T-063 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Francisco Ibarra Jimenez

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. Del Trabajador Al Pago Oportuno De Su Remuneracion. Ejecucion Presupuestal. Docente. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la Sentencia proferida el 13 de septiembre de 1994 por el Juzgado
  2. Tercero. Penal del Circuito de Ipiales, al resolver sobre la acción de tutela instaurada por FRANCISCO IBARRA JIMENEZ.
  3. Segundo. CONCEDESE la tutela impetrada y, en consecuencia, ORDENASE al Gobernador de Nariño que, si todavía no lo ha hecho, proceda dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación del presente fallo, a cancelar totalmente los salarios atrasados de FRANCISCO IBARRA JIMENEZ, siempre que haya partida presupuestal disponible. En caso contrario, dentro del mismo término, iniciará los trámites correspondientes e informará de ello, en forma inmediata, al juez de primera instancia.
  4. Tercero. El cumplimiento estricto del presente fallo será supervisado y exigido por el Juez
  5. Tercero. Penal del Circuito de Ipiales.
  6. Cuarto. LIBRESE la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.