JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 6, 2004

T-1218 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Abigail Castellano De Salazar Vs. Cajanal

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida Digna Y La Salud En Conexidad Con La Vida Y La Integridad Personal De Afiliada A Quien Le Fue Diagnosticado Glaucoma Crónico Y Formulado Medicamento No Pos Que La Entidad Se Niega A Suministrar Aduciendo Razones De Orden Administrativo.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Entrega de medicamento excluido del POS
  • Fundamental por conexidad con la vida digna
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia del cinco (5) de agosto de 2004 proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. (1º) Civil del Circuito de la ciudad de Barranquilla y, en su lugar, CONCEDER la tutela de los derechos a la vida digna, la salud en conexidad con la vida y la integridad personal, dentro de la acción instaurada por la señora Abigail Castellano de Salazar contra la Caja Nacional de Previsión Social CAJANAL S.A. E.P.S..
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Caja Nacional de Previsión Social CAJANAL S.A. E.P.S., que en el término de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación de la presente sentencia, suministre a la señora Abigail Castellanos de Salazar el medicamento Cosopt, de acuerdo con lo prescrito por su médico tratante.
  4. Tercero. LÍBRESE por secretaría la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.