JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 27, 2003

T-1121 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Nancy Gomez Martinez Contra Fondo Nacional Del Ahorro

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos Litigiosos De Contenido Economico. Deuda Sobre Inmueble Rematado En 1989. Cesantias Se Aplicaron Al Credito Y Ahora Se Reclaman Y Con Pago De Perjuicios. Existencia De Otro Mecanismo Judicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Fondo Nacional Del Ahorro
  • Cobro de saldo que quedó pendiente después del remate del bien inmueble
Medio De Defensa Judicial Eficaz
  • Controversia de orden legal
Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia para definir derechos litigiosos de contenido económico
Indemnizacion De Perjuicios En Tutela
  • Requisitos para que proceda
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. Primero. Confirmar en su integridad y por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia, el fallo proferido por la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Bogotá el 19 de junio de 2003, dentro de la acción de tutela instaurada por Nancy Gómez Martínez contra el Fondo Nacional de Ahorro.
  4. Segundo. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.