JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 7, 2002

T-071 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Jose Ignacio Forero Vasquez Vs. Alcalde Municipal De Tesalia Huila Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Trabajo Y Subsistencia. Programa Estimulacion De Produccion Agropecuaria. Creditos En Especie Y Dinero Para El Reconocimiento De Jornales. Incumplimiento En La Entrega. Firate. Derechos Litigiosos De Contenido Economico. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia para definir derechos litigiosos de contenido económico
Fondo De Inversion Y Reactivacion Agropecuaria
  • Beneficiario de programa no tuvo relación laboral
Partida Presupuestal
  • Ejecución no procede por tutela
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. Primero. Confirmar, el fallo adoptado por el Juzgado
  4. Segundo. Civil del Circuito de la Plata-Huila en providencia del 6 de Marzo de 2001, mediante el cual se denegó la tutela presentada por el Señor Ignacio Forero Vásquez contra el Alcalde Municipal de Tesalia y el Fondo de Inversión y Reactivación Agropecuaria de Tesalia "FIRATE".
  5. Segundo. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.