JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 28, 1998

T-262 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Fernando Carrillo Florez

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Via De Hecho. Responsabilidad Disciplinaria. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Accion De Nulidad Y Restablecimiento Del Der. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Sanción disciplinaria de suspensión
Perjuicio Irremediable
  • Inexistencia por sanción disciplinaria de suspensión
Acción De Tutela
  • No sustituye mecanismos de defensa judicial
Juez De Tutela
  • Respeto de jurisdicciones establecidas
Jurisdiccion Contencioso Administrativa
  • Revisión de actos administrativos de orden disciplinario
5 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. R E S U E L V E
  2. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia de la seccion primera de la Sala Contencioso Administrativa del Consejo de Estado, del dia 3 de diciembre de 1997, mediante la cual se ratifico la decision del Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca que declaro improcedente la accion de tutela instaurada por Fernando Carrillo Florez contra el Procurador General de la Nacion y la Procuraduria General de la Nacion.
  3. Segundo. Librense por Secretaria las comunicaciones a que se refiere el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.