JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 1, 2002

T-151 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Nelcy Cristina Otero Ojeda Vs. Instituto Tecnico Comercial Gimnasio Pablo Vi De Soledad

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Educacion De Menor De Edad. Solicitud Expedicion Certificados De Estudio Y Reintegro De Dinero. Obligacion Contractual. Mora En El Pago De Pensiones. Prohibicion Ingresos A Clases. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Educacion Del Niño
  • Prohibición de retiro de clases o retención de certificado de estudios por no pago de pensión
Indemnizacion De Perjuicios En Tutela
  • Requisitos para que proceda
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo proferido por el Juzgado Promiscuo del Circuito de Soledad, Atlantico el ocho (8) de octubre de 2001.
  2. Segundo. CONCEDER, por las razones expuestas, la tutela interpuesta por la senora Nelcy Cristina Otero Ojeda a favor del derecho fundamental a la educacion de su hijo Oscar David Sampayo Otero. En consecuencia, ORDENAR al Instituto Tecnico Comercial Gimnasio Pablo VI de Soledad que en el termino de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas contados a partir de la notificacion de la presente sentencia, expida los certificados de estudio del menor Oscar David Sampayo Otero correspondientes a los grados 6deg, 7deg, 8deg y 9deg, cursados entre 1996 y 1999.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.