JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 5, 2002

T-1097 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Luis Felipe Escobar Ortiz Vs. Municipio De Bugalagrande

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Mesadas Pensionales. Doble Pension De Jubilacion. Nestle. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
Derecho Al Minimo Vital Del Pensionado
  • No se justifica argumentar el recibo de otra pensión
  • Pago oportuno y completo de mesadas
  • Valoración
Empleador
  • Situación económica o presupuestal no es óbice para desconocer pago de mesadas pensionales
Derecho A La Seguridad Social De Persona De La Tercera Edad
  • Afectación mínimo vital por no pago oportuno de mesadas pensionales
6 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Bugalagrande, el 13 de agosto de 2002 y, en su lugar, CONCEDER la tutela impetrada por el senor Luis Felipe Escobar Ortiz
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR al Alcalde del Municipio de Bugalagrande, que si aun no se ha hecho, reanude el pago de las mesadas pensionales del demandante, en el termino maximo de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas contadas a partir de la notificacion de la presente sentencia.
  3. Librense por Secretaria, las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  4. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.