JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 12, 2007

T-532 de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Mildreth Muñoz Gonzalez Vs. Salud Total

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a la vida digna la seguridad social la salud y al minimo vital de afiliada como cotizante independiente que presenta un embarazo de alto riesgo y fue incapacitada pero la entidad se niega a reconcerle la incapacidad aduciendo en algunos casos la mora de sus pagos.solicita se ordene el pago de la incapacidad.procedencia excepcional de la accion de tutela para el pago de incapacidades laborales.

Razones que fundamentan la procedencia excepcional de la tutela.

Allanamiento a la mora.concedida

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la decision adoptada por el Juzgado
  2. Septimo. Penal del Circuito de Cali y en su lugar, CONCEDER la tutela de los derechos fundamentales a la vida digna, seguridad social, salud y al minimo vital de la demandante.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR a la E.P.S. SALUD TOTAL- Sucursal Cali- que en el termino de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a partir de la notificacion de este fallo, proceda a pagar a la actora el valor de las incapacidades laborales que le corresponden.
  4. Tercero. DESE cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.