JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 15, 2002

T-664 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Melina Del Mar Marin Espinosa Vs. Iss

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Dignidad Y Minimo Vital Y Salud De Madre E Hijo. Solicitud Pago Licencia De Maternidad Trabajadora Independiente. Mora Y Extemporanidad En Pago De Aportes. Allanamiento En La Mora. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Licencia De Maternidad
  • Fundamental por conexidad
  • Objeto
  • Hace parte del mínimo vital
  • Pago por saneamiento de la mora
Trabajador Independiente
  • Saneamiento de la mora en pago de cotizaciones
3 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR el fallo proferido por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial, Sala de Familia, de Cali, el 28 de mayo de 2002. En su lugar CONCEDER la acción de tutela interpuesta por Melina del Mar Marín Espinosa contra el Seguro Social.
  2. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR a la EPS del Seguro Social, que dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación de este fallo, proceda a pagar la licencia de maternidad a la señora Melina del Mar Marín Espinosa.
  3. TERCERO. Para los efectos del artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, el juzgado de origen hará las notificaciones y tomará las medidas conducentes para el cumplimiento de esta sentencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.