JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 31, 2000

T-965 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Yolanda Jaimes Villamizar

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Trabajo En Condiciones Dignas Y Justas. A La Educacion. Debido Proceso. Traslado Por Necesidad Del Servicio. Negada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional para revocar orden de traslado
Empleador
  • Traslado por necesidades del servicio
Jurisdiccion Contencioso Administrativa
  • Verificación legalidad de traslado
Medio De Defensa Judicial Eficaz
  • Verificación legalidad de traslado
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por la Sala Civil Familia del Tribunal Superior de Tunja del 20 de enero de 2000.
  2. Segundo. LÍBRESE por la Secretaría General de esta Corporación, la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.