JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 16, 1996

T-715 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Maria Eugenia Ramirez Suarez

✓
Topic · hard data
Regimen De Personal De La Aerocivil. Planta De Personal Global Y Flexible. Ius Variandi. Traslado De Cargo A Otra Ciudad. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Aerocivil
  • Planta de personal global y flexible
Revocacion Traslado De Funcionarios
  • Improcedencia general de tutela
Poder Discrecional De La Administracion
  • Libertad limitada sobre traslados
Traslado
  • Administradora de aeropuerto
5 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. R E S U E L V E:
  2. Primero. REVOCAR parcialmente el fallo proferido por la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior de Ibague, el dia seis de agosto de 1996 y, en consecuencia, denegar la tutela solicitada por la ciudadana Maria Eugenia Ramirez Suarez.
  3. Segundo. CONFIRMAR el numeral
  4. Tercero. de la referida sentencia, por medio del cual se ordena expedir copias de lo pertinente con destino a la Procuraduria General de la Nacion, con el objeto de que esta investigue si los directivos de Aerocivil incurrieron en una falta disciplinaria en la actuacion que desarrollaron en relacion con el traslado de la actora.
  5. Tercero. Librense por Secretaria las comunicaciones a que se refiere el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.