JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 9, 2002

T-344 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Gloria Ines Llano Garcia Vs. Susalud

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida Y Salud De Afiliados O Beneficiarios. Solicitud Asistencia Medica Integral Y Suministro Medicamentos No Incluidos En El Pos. Controversias Entre Comité Tecnico Cientifico Y Medico Tratante. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Comite Tecnico Cientifico Y Medico Tratante
  • En conflictos sobre medicamentos prevalecen los que ha ordenado el médico
Derecho A La Salud
  • Suministro de medicamentos para aliviar enfermedad
Comite Tecnico Cientifico De Entidad Promotora De Salud
  • Criterios que se deben tener en cuenta para autorizar medicamentos no incluidos en el POS
  • Funciones
Plan Obligatorio De Salud
  • Suministro de medicamentos excluidos del POS
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Confirmar el fallo proferido por Juzgado 25 Penal Municipal de Bogota en el proceso T-423413, mediante sentencia del dos (2) de enero de dos mil uno (2001).
  2. Segundo. Comunicar la presente decision al Ministerio de Salud, a la Superintendencia Nacional de Salud y al Consejo Nacional de Seguridad Social en Salud.
  3. Tercero. Librar, por medio de la Secretaria General, las comunicaciones previstas en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.