JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 5, 2001

T-722 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Yuber Alfonso Galindo Jimenez Vs. Cajanal .·Respondent Sin Información

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida Digna Salud Igualdad Y Seguridad Social. Solicitud De Medicamento Necesario Para Curar Acne Maduro. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Suministro de medicamentos para el acné
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado Cincuenta y Cuatro Civil Municipal de Bogota, y la sentencia adoptada por el Juzgado Treinta y Uno Civil del Circuito de Bogota, dentro de la accion de tutela instaurada por Yulder Alfonso Galindo Jimenez contra la Caja Nacional de Prevision Social -CAJANAL-, Seccional Bogota. En su lugar CONCEDER el amparo solicitado.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Caja Nacional de Prevision Social -CAJANAL- Seccional Bogota, que dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas contadas a partir de la notificacion de esta providencia, suministre al senor Yulder Alfonso Galindo Jimenez, el medicamento ISOTARTINOINA ORAL, ordenado por el medico tratante.
  3. Tercero. INAPLICAR por inconstitucional para el caso concreto, el literal b) del articulo 4o de la Resolucion No.5061 de 1997 del Ministerio de Salud.
  4. Cuarto. Por Secretaria General, librense las comunicaciones previstas en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.