JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 12, 1995

T-207 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Oscar Hernando Vera Parada Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Ders. Prestacionales. Der. A La Salud. Estancamiento De Aguas Negras. Alcantarillado. Negligencia Adtiva. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia de tutela proferida por el Juzgado 2o Penal Municipal de Turbo -Antioquia- dentro del proceso de la referencia, en cuanto tutelo el derecho a la salud de Oscar Hernando Vera Parada y Silvia Margarita Gallego Ortiz.
  2. SEGUNDO. REVOCAR la orden emitida por el Juzgado 2o Penal Municipal de Turbo -Antioquia- dentro del proceso de la referencia, y en su lugar, ORDENAR a la administracion municipal de Turbo -Antioquia- la realizacion de las gestiones necesarias para solucionar, en forma definitiva, el problema de desague de aguas negras en el sector comprendido entre la calle 104 y la carrera 17 de la ciudad de Turbo, dentro de un periodo razonable.
  3. TERCERO. COMUNICAR a traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional el contenido de la sentencia al Juzgado 2o Penal Municipal de Turbo -Antioquia-, al Alcalde del municipio de Turbo, al Defensor del Pueblo y a los peticionarios de la presente tutela.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.