JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 15, 2001

T-635 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Martha Ligia Sanchez Perez Vs. I.S.S.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida Salud Seguridad Social E Igualdad. Solicitud De Tratamiento Medico Y Examenes Por Insuficiencia Renal. Las Trabas De Caracter Burocratico Y Administrativo No Justifican La Demora En La Prestacion Del Servicio De Salud A Una Persona Que S
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Trámite administrativo que demora la prestación del servicio por parte de la EPS
  • Transplante de riñón
Accion De Tutela Temeraria
  • Inexistencia por cuanto se presentan hechos nuevos
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Revocar el fallo proferido por el Juzgado 13 Penal del Circuito de Medellín, el cinco (5) de octubre del año dos mil (2000), dentro del proceso de la referencia.
  2. Segundo. Declarar la carencia de objeto en el presente proceso, por sustracción de materia.
  3. Tercero. Librar, por medio de la Secretaría General, las comunicaciones previstas en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, así como también comunicar el fallo al Juzgado 10 Civil Municipal de Medellín.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.