JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 25, 2004

T-613 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Sergio Aldana Murayari Vs. Cajanal

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion De Pensionado. Solicitud Reliquidación De Pension Gracia. Terminos Para Resolver Derecho De Peticion Por Las Autoridades. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Cajanal no respondió dentro del término legal
  • Requisitos de la respuesta
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado 11 Penal del Circuito de Bogotá, el 15 de enero de 2004, por las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. CONCEDER la protección constitucional del derecho de petición solicitado por el señor Sergio Aldana Murayari y en consecuencia, ORDENAR al representante legal de CAJANAL, que dentro del término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, siguientes a la notificación de este fallo, expida, si aún no lo ha hecho, el acto administrativo que resuelva de manera clara, precisa y de fondo la solicitud elevada por el actor.
  3. Cuarto. Dar cumplimiento a lo previsto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.