JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 17, 2004

T-605 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Uprimny Yepes

✓Claimant Carmen Lucia Andrade Gualy Vs. Cajanal

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Maternidad Y Minimo Vital De Empleada De Servicio Domestico. Solicitud Pago Licencia De Maternidad. Cancelación Extemporánea De Aportes Por Empleador Y Allanamiento A La Mora. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Empleador
  • Mora de aportes en salud
  • Pago extemporáneo de aportes a seguridad social en salud
Licencia De Maternidad
  • Reglas aplicables para el pago
  • Ampliación del término al primer año de vida del niño para presentar la tutela
  • Pago aunque se haya cotizado extemporáneamente
2 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Tribunal Superior de Neiva. En consecuencia, CONCEDER la tutela de los derechos fundamentales a la maternidad y al mínimo vital de la señora CARMEN LUCIA ANDRADE GUALY.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a CAJANAL E.P.S. que dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación del presente fallo, proceda a pagar a la accionante el valor de la licencia de maternidad que le corresponde.
  3. Tercero. DÉSE cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.