JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 20, 2004

T-499 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Sergio Enrique Gustavo Bobillier Vs. Iss Cundinamarca

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Solicitud Pension De Vejez. Silencio Administrativo Negativo. Agotamiento Via Gubernativa. Termino De Quince Dias Para Resolver. Presuncion De Veracidad. Carencia Actual De Objeto. Sustraccion De Materia. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCAR por las razones expuestas la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado treinta y tres Civil del Circuito de Bogotá.
  2. Segundo. DECLARAR la carencia actual de objeto, por existir un hecho superado.
  3. Tercero. Por
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 32cited by 16 →T-499/04T-377/00 — Derecho De Peticion Y Defensa. Debido Proceso. Presentacion Del Escrito De Excepciones Previas Ante Juez Que No Era Competente Para Recibirl · cited 384 timesT-377/002000T-294/97 — Der. De Peticion. Pronta Resolucion De Recursos. Reconoc. De Pension. Prestacion De Servicios Medicos. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Concedida · cited 250 timesT-294/971997T-1089/01 — Derecho De Peticion. Solicitud Informacion De Los Requisitos Para Acceder A La Pension De Invalidez Respuesta Clara Y Oportuna. Silencio Adm · cited 151 timesT-1089/012001T-242/93 — Derecho De Peticion. Silencio Administrativo Negativo. Solicitud De Pension. Caja Nacional De Prevision.Concedida. · cited 151 timesT-242/931993T-220/94 — Der. De Peticion. Pension De Jubilacion. Caja Nal De Prevision. Concedida. · cited 112 timesT-220/941994T-271/01 — Derechos A La Salud Vida Dignidad Humana Seguridad Social E Integridad Fisica Y Moral. Practica Transplante Total De Cadera. Carencia De Obj · cited 96 timesT-271/012001T-1104/02 — Derecho De Peticion. Solicitud Reconocimiento Y Pago Pension De Sobrevivientes. Respuesta Clara Y Oportuna. Deber De Informar. Seis Meses. S · cited 81 timesT-1104/022002T-304/94 — Der. De Peticion. Silencio Administrativo. Demora Del Inderena En Resolver Un Recurso. Concedida. · cited 68 timesT-304/941994T-219/07 · cited 83 timesT-219/072007T-830/06 · cited 62 timesT-830/062006T-134/06 · cited 31 timesT-134/062006T-495/06 · cited 15 timesT-495/062006T-374/08 · cited 12 timesT-374/082008T-1213/05 · cited 12 timesT-1213/052005T-027/07 — · cited 10 timesT-027/072007T-213/05 · cited 8 timesT-213/052005
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.