JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 9, 2001

T-271 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Ana Hermencia Solano Jimenez Vs. Iss Boyaca

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Salud Vida Dignidad Humana Seguridad Social E Integridad Fisica Y Moral. Practica Transplante Total De Cadera. Carencia De Objeto Por Sustraccion De Materia. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Carencia actual de objeto
Derecho A La Vida Digna
  • Criterios de protección para atención de salud
Derecho A La Salud
  • Alcance de la protección
Negligencia Administrativa
  • Omisión en el suministro de medios de prueba
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la decisión proferida el 30 de agosto de 2000 por el Juzgado 2 Civil del Circuito de Sogamoso.
  2. Segundo. Declarar por las razones aducidas la carencia de objeto, por sustracción de materia en el presente caso.
  3. Tercero. Ordenar que se envíe copia de esta providencia a la Procuraduría Regional de Boyacá para que evalúe la conducta asumida por el representante legal del Instituto de Seguros Sociales - Seccional Boyacá - y establezca las sanciones disciplinarias a que haya lugar.
  4. Cuarto. Por Secretaría General, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.