JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 18, 2008

T-914 de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Julio Cesar Campo Ceballos·Respondent Seguros Bolivar S.A.

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Hecho superado por cuanto la cirugía bariátrica ya le fue realizada al peticionario
Derecho A La Salud
  • Autorización de cirugía bariátrica por empresa de medicina prepagada
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a la salud y vida por cuanto la accionada en el marco de un contrato de medicina prepagada, se nego a autorizarle la realizacion de una cirugia bariatrica.

Sin embargo durante el tramite de la tutela se constato que la cirugia fue realizada por lo que eiste un hecho superado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. DECLARAR que existe carencia actual de objeto por presentarse un hecho superado, y por esta única razón CONFIRMAR las sentencias proferidas por el Juzgado
  2. Séptimo. Penal Municipal de Barranquilla el cinco (5) de diciembre de dos mil siete (2007) y por el Juzgado
  3. Séptimo. Penal del Circuito de Barranquilla el once (11) de febrero de dos mil ocho (2008), en el asunto de la referencia.
  4. Segundo. Por Secretaría, LÍBRESE la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.