JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 20, 2002

T-211 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Arelys Merith Aguirre Jimenez Vs. Iss Magdalena

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital De Madre E Hijo Recien Nacido. Solicitud Reconocimeinto Y Pago Licencia De Maternidad A Empleada Del Servicio Domestico. Mora En Pago De Aportes Por Parte Del Empleador. Allanamiento A La Mora. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Licencia De Maternidad
  • Pago por allanamiento a la mora por EPS
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la providencia proferida por Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Civil del Circuito de Santa Marta, el 16 de octubre de 2001 y en su lugar TUTELAR los derechos fundamentales a la maternidad, a la protección del recién nacido y al mínimo vital de la señora Arelys Merith Aguirre Jiménez, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de este fallo.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR a la E.P.S. -Instituto de Seguros Sociales, Seccional Magdalena- que dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación del presente fallo proceda a reconocer y pagar a favor de la señora Arelys Merith Aguirre Jiménez el valor de la licencia de maternidad.
  4. Tercero. Líbrese por Secretaría, las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  5. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.