JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 20, 2009

T-189 de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Jorge Elias Manzur Jattin·Respondent Sala De Casacion Penal De La Corte Suprema De Justicia

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho al debido proceso cuya proteccion reclama sujeto dentro de un proceso fallado por la sala penal de la corte suprema de justicia, a traves del cual resulto condenado por concusion debido a hechos acaecidos durante su ejercicio como gobernador del departamento de cordoba, que alega que en dicho tramite el despacho accionado incurrio en defectos organicos, procedimentales y facticos. <br>requisitos de procedencia de la accion de tutela contra providencias judiciales.

Reiteracion jurisprudencial. <br>la sala encontro insatisfecho el requisito de inmediatez, imprescindible como causal general de viabilidad de la accion de tutela contra decisiones judiciales. <br>negada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR, por las razones expuestas, la sentencia de tutela proferida por la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura, el 30 de julio de 2008, mediante la cual se declaró la improcedencia de la acción de tutela incoada por Jorge Elías Manzur Jattin contra la Sala de Casación Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, LÍBRENSE las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.