JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 28, 2002

T-147 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Raul Sanchez Rodriguez Vs. Sociedad Tevicom Ltda

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion Frente A Particulares Que Prestan Servicio Publico De Television De Persona Que No Ha Podido Vincularse A Otra Eps. Respuesta Clara Y Oportuna. Mora En El Pago De Aportes Por Empleador. Estado De Indefension. Subordinacion De Extrabaja
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion Ante Organizaciones Privadas
  • Prestación de servicio público de televisión
  • Alcance
Derecho De Peticion
  • Pronta resolución
Derecho De Peticion De Extrabajador
  • No se ha informado a la E.P.S. finalización de la relación laboral
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR por las razones expuestas en el presente fallo, la sentencia del 26 de septiembre de 2001 proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Barrancabermeja en la tutela de la referencia.
  3. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR que en el termino de cuarenta y ocho horas la sociedad TEVICOM LTDA. Conteste la peticion que RAUL SANCHEZ RODRIGUEZ le formulo el 30 de julio de 2001.
  4. TERCERO. Por Secretaria, LIBRESE la comunicacion prevista por el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.