JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 22, 2001

T-1223 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Roberto Mendoza Martin Vs. Tribunal Superior De Bogota Sala Penal·Respondent Sin Información

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Debido Proceso. Tutela Contra Via De Hecho Judicial. Proceso Penal Por El Delito De Homicidio Agravado. Principio De Legalidad No Reformatio In Pejus Y Favorabilidad Penal. Incremento De La Pena. Carcel La Picota. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Principio No Reformatio In Pejus
  • No estaba vigente al momento de dictar la providencia
  • Situaciones fácticas consolidadas en el tiempo
  • Alcance
Via De Hecho
  • Procedencia excepcional de tutela
  • Clases de defectos en la actuación
  • Concepto
4 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR las decisiones de tutela proferidas en el proceso de la referencia por El Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, Seccion Segunda - Subseccion A, el 21 de mayo de 2001 y por el Consejo de Estado, Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo - Seccion Cuarta, el 19 de julio del mismo ano, por las razones establecidas en la parte motiva de este fallo.
  2. Segundo. LIBRESE por Secretaria la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.