JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 2, 1992

T-438 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Argemiro Ramirez

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Derecho Disciplinario. Personal Docente. Intervencion En Politica De Empleado Publico. Negada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el fallo del Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, de fecha 3 de Marzo de 1992, por la cual se nego la tutela impetrada por Argemiro Ramirez Mendivelso.
  2. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR a la Secretaria de la Corte Constitucional que se comunique este fallo al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, para los efectos establecidos en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.