JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 27, 1997

T-094 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Rosa Gilma Rey De Duarte

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales. Inexistencia De Via De Hecho. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Situacion De Conyuge Superstite Con Matrimonio En Panama. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia contra interpretaciones de la ley
Presuncion Separacion De Bienes
  • Personas casadas en el extranjero y domiciliadas
Via De Hecho
  • Procedencia excepcional de tutela
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR en todas sus partes el fallo proferido por el Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Cundinamarca, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria, el día diecisiete (17) de septiembre de mil novecientos noventa y seis (1996), al resolver sobre la acción de tutela interpuesta por la señora ROSA GILMA REY DE DUARTE, por medio de apoderado, y contra providencias judiciales de la Sala de Decisión de Familia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santa Fe de Bogotá, y en consecuencia no conceder la protección solicitada.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría LIBRESE la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.