JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 14, 2000Full bench

C-697 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Carmen Trujillo Sarmiento

✓
Topic · hard data
Titulo De Idoneidad Y Tarjeta Profesional. Excepción A Principios De Libertad E Igualdad
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Agente De Viajes
  • Límites y controles legales a la gestión empresarial
Ausencia De Tecnica Legislativa
  • Falta de definición del sujeto y contenido de la obligación
Derecho A La Igualdad
  • Vulneración por limitar la libertad y el acceso al mercado laboral
Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Labor interpretativa del contenido
  • Fallo inhibitorio por falta de formulación de cargos
Titulo De Idoneidad
  • Exigencia en actividades que impliquen riesgo social
  • Reserva legal
  • Agente de viajes y turismo
Mercado Laboral
  • Ejercicio de actividad comercial que no implica riesgo social
Titulo De Idoneidad Y Tarjeta Profesional
  • Excepción a principios de libertad e igualdad
15 topics · 13 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 32/90.

Por la cual se reglamenta la profesion de agente de viajes.

Inexequibles e inhibitoria.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 32/90. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 1Ley 32/90STRUCK DOWN· phrase
Art. 11Ley 32/90STRUCK DOWN
Art. 2Ley 32/90STRUCK DOWN
Art. 3Ley 32/90STRUCK DOWN
Phrase struck down«inciso 2 literal a»
Art. 4Ley 32/90STRUCK DOWN
Phrase struck down«literal a, b, c»
Art. 7Ley 32/90STRUCK DOWN
Art. 9Ley 32/90STRUCK DOWN
Art. 85Ley 300/96STRUCK DOWN
Phrase struck down«parágrafo 2»
8 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (9 points)
  1. Primero. Declarar INEXEQUIBLES los siguientes apartes y articulos de la Ley 32 de 1990:
  2. a) La expresion "Para tal efecto se considera la persona natural graduada en facultades o escuelas de Educacion Superior que funcionen legalmente en el pais, en programas cuyos planes de estudio formen profesionalmente a los estudiantes en este ramo, segun concepto emitido por el ICFES", del articulo 1o.
  3. b) La frase "de educacion superior" del articulo 2.
  4. c) El inciso
  5. segundo. del literal a) del articulo 3.
  6. d) Los literales a), b) y c) del articulo 4.
  7. e) Los articulos 7, 9, 11
  8. Segundo. Declarar INEXEQUIBLE el paragrafo 2deg del articulo 85 de la Ley 300 de 1996.
  9. Tercero. Declararse inhibida para conocer las restantes disposiciones de la Ley 32 de 1990.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.