C-107 de 2004
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería
✓Claimant Helmult Dioney Vallejo Tunjo
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Importancia
- Reglas de remisión
- Derecho a postular y excepcionar
- Extensión a toda clase de actuaciones
- Naturaleza, sentido y alcance
- Previa existencia de régimen normativo sobre actuaciones y procedimientos
- Razón de ser y características
- Aplicación del procedimiento penal
- Aplicación del procedimiento penal
- Etapa procesal para notificación sobre término de traslado
- No señalamiento de término a partir del cual el investigado puede ejercerlo
- Término para presentación
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 734 de 2002.
Art. 92 num. 8.
Codigo disciplinario unico.
Derechos del investigado.
Notificacion en debida forma.
Presentacion alegatos de conclusion antes del fallo de primera o unica instancia.
Oportunidad procesal.
Debido proceso.
Derecho sancionado
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 734/02. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- 1. Declarar la EXEQUIBILIDAD del numeral 8º del artículo 92 de la ley 734 de 2002, por los cargos de esta sentencia.
- 2.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.