JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)January 28, 2003Full bench

C-030 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Lucia Esmeralda Restrepo Gomez

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 600 De 2000. Art. 365 Num. 3. Codigo De Procedimiento Penal. Libertad Provisional. Causales. Caucion Prendaria. Preclusion De La Investigacion. Cesacion De Procedimiento. Sentencia Absolutoria. Presuncion De Inocencia. In Dubio Pro Reo. Cosa Juzgada C
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Alcance
  • Categorías conceptuales que delimitan alcance
  • Modulación de operancia
Libertad Provisional Con Caucion Prendaria
  • Preclusión de investigación, cesación de procedimiento o sentencia absolutoria en primera instancia
  • Presupuesto para carácter definitivo ante preclusión de investigación, cesación de procedimiento o sentencia absolutoria en primera instancia
8 topics · 11 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 600/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 365Ley 600/00UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el numeral 3o del articulo 365 de la Ley 600 de 2000, "por la cual se expide el Codigo de Procedimiento Penal", por los cargos analizados en esta sentencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.