JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 1, 2005

T-796 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Indira Gandi Ortega Ceron Vs. Iss

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Licencia De Maternidad
  • Término para reclamarla superó el año que se ha establecido por la jurisprudencia
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a la seguridad social y al minimo vital de afiliada madre cabeza de familia a quien la entidad se niega a reconocerle y pagarle la licencia de maternidad aduciendo el pago de aportes en forma extemporánea.

Solicita se ordene el pago de la licencia de maternidad.

La licencia de maternidad y su especial protección constitucional.

Para que el derecho al pago de la licencia de maternidad pueda ser protegido de manera excepcional a traves de la accion d etutela se requiere que frente a cada caso concreto se de cumplimiento a los requisitos establecidos por la jurisprudencia constitucional y en particular el que exige que la accion de tutela se interponga durante el primer año de vida del menor.

Negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. Confirmar las Sentencias de fechas abril 13 de 2005 y mayo 17 de 2005 proferidas por el Juzgado
  2. Cuarto. de Familia de Neiva y la Sala Civil Familia Laboral del Tribunal Superior de Neiva, que decidieron denegar el amparo solicitado, por las consideraciones realizadas en esta providencia.
  3. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.