JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 11, 2000

T-1176 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Maria Cecilia Muñoz Pachon Vs. Famisanar Ltda Eps.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud Y A La Vida. Tratamiento Y Examenes Excluidos Del Pos. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Plan Obligatorio De Salud
  • Cubrimiento de exámenes excluídos
Entidad Promotora De Salud
  • Repetición contra el FOSYGA
Derecho A La Salud
  • Fundamental por conexidad con la vida
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia del 21 de marzo de 2000 del Juzgado
  2. Octavo. Civil del Circuito de Bogotá, que negó la tutela solicitada por María Cecilia Muñoz Pachón.
  3. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaría líbrense las comunicaciones previstas en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.