JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 31, 2002

T-051 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Francisca Salas Maestre Vs. Cajanal Guajira

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Solicitud Reconocimiento Pension De Jubilacion. Respuesta Clara Y Oportuna. Resolucion Sobre Recurso De Reposicion Interpuesto. Integracion Del Contradictorio. Principios De Oficiosidad E Informalidad. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Integracion Del Contradictorio
  • Deber del juez de tutela
Derecho De Petición
  • Respuesta oportuna y de fondo
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR por las razones expuestas en esta providencia, la sentencia del día catorce (14) de agosto de dos mil uno (2001), proferida por el juzgado
  2. primero. civil del circuito de Riohacha, que negó la tutela incoada por la señora Francisca Salas Maestre.
  3. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela del derecho fundamental de petición, y en consecuencia, ordenar a la Caja Nacional de Previsión Social que dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación de la presente providencia, resuelva sobre el recurso de reposición interpuesto por la accionante.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaría líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.