JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 7, 2000

T-1175 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Sindulfo Torres Montaño Vs. Ministerio Del Trabajo Y Seguridad Social.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Recursos Para Agotar La Via Gubernativa. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Pronta resolución
Derecho De Peticion En Via Gubernativa
  • Recursos de reposición y apelación
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo proferido por el Juzgado 15 Penal Municipal de Cali, el 24 de marzo de 2000. En su lugar, CONCEDER el derecho de petición del señor Sindulfo Torres Montaño.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Dirección Regional del Valle del Cauca del Ministerio del Trabajo y Seguridad Social, que, si todavía no lo ha hecho, resuelva, a más tardar dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación del presente fallo, el recurso de apelación, interpuesto por el accionante contra la Resolución 0359 del 14 de octubre de 1999.
  3. Tercero. LÍBRESE por Secretaría la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.