JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 4, 1998

T-637 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Guillermo Granados Agudelo

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Der. A Que Los Recursos Interpuestos Sean Resueltos Oportunamente. Pension De Jubilacion. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Pronta resolución
  • Resolución oportuna de recursos
Debido Proceso Administrativo
  • Resolución oportuna de recursos
Pension De Jubilacion
  • Improcedencia de reconocimiento por tutela
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Consejo de Estado -Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo-, el dia 10 de julio de 1998, que declaro improcedente la tutela de la referencia y en su lugar CONFIRMAR el fallo del Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Cundinamarca -Seccion Segunda- del 4 de junio de 1998 que tutelo el derecho de peticion del actor. En consecuencia se ordena al I.S.S., que dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificacion de la presente sentencia resuelva los recursos interpuestos.
  2. Segundo. LIBRENSE las comunicaciones previstas en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.