JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 23, 1998

T-306 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Armando Sosa Pinto

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Der. A Que Los Recursos Interpuestos Se Resuelvan Oportunamente. Traslado De Docente. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCAR los fallos proferidos por la Sala Plena del Tribunal Administrativo de Boyacá y por la Sección Segunda de la Sala contencioso administrativa del Consejo de Estado.
  2. Segundo. CONCÉDESE la tutela impetrada por Armando Sosa Pinto. El gobernador de Boyacá, si no lo ha hecho ya, deberá responder dentro del término de cuarenta y ocho horas (48 ) siguientes a la notificación de la presente sentencia, el recurso de reposición contra el decreto que ordenó el traslado del actor.
  3. Tercero. Dese cumplimiento al articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.