JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 10, 1997

T-188 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Marcos Orlando Romero

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Solicitud De Reconocimiento Y Pago De Pension De Jubilacion. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Pronta resolución
Silencio Administrativo Negativo
  • Resolución de solicitudes
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia dictada por el Juzgado
  2. Sexto. Laboral del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá el 14 de noviembre de 1996 y, en su lugar, tutelar el derecho de petición de los ciudadanos Marcos Orlando Romero Quevedo, Alfredo Villabon Hernández y Luz Elida Bonilla Guzmán.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Caja Nacional de Previsión que, si aún no lo ha hecho, resuelva la petición de los ciudadanos nombrados en el numeral anterior, dentro del término máximo de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación de esta sentencia, so pena de las sanciones previstas en el Decreto 2591 de 1991 para el desacato.
  4. Tercero. COMUNICAR la presente providencia al Juzgado
  5. Sexto. Laboral del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá, para los fines previstos en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  6. Comuníquese, notifíquese, cúmplase e
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.