JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 29, 2004

T-050 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Luis Eduardo Gil Sanchez Vs. Iss Antioquia

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Vida Salud Seguridad Social Y Minimo Vital De Trabajador Oficial. Solicitud Reconocimiento Y Pago Pension De Jubilacion. Emision Bono Pensional. No Cumplimiento De Requisitos. Dilacion Injustificada. Seis Meses. Investigacion Disciplinaria.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia general para reconocimiento de pensiones
  • Improcedencia general para reconocimiento de derechos pensionales
  • Inexistencia de perjuicio irremediable
Derecho Al Minimo Vital Del Pensionado
  • Vulneración por no emisión del bono pensional
Derecho A La Seguridad Social En Pensiones
  • Fundamental por conexidad con la vida
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR las sentencias proferidas por el Juzgado
  2. Sexto. Laboral del Circuito de Medellín y la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior de Medellín, el 26 de junio y el 25 de julio de 2003 respectivamente, mediante las cuales no se accedió al amparo constitucional solicitado en la acción de tutela de la referencia.
  3. Segundo. REMITIR copia del expediente a la Procuraduría General de la Nación para los fines expuestos en esta providencia.
  4. Tercero. Dar cumplimiento a lo previsto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.