JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 23, 2004

T-792 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Esperanza Chavez Fonseca Vs. Telecom

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Igualdad A La Familia A La Proteccion Especial De La Mujer Y De Los Niños De Madre Discapacitada Cabeza De Familia Empleada De Telecom Por La Decision De La Empresa De Retirarla Del Reten Social Que La Ampara Para No Ser Despedida De Su Emple
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogota - Sala Civil - de fecha veintitres (23) de marzo de 2004, y, en su lugar, CONCEDER la tutela de los derechos consagrados en los articulos 13, 42, 43 y 44 de la Constitucion Politica dentro de la accion instaurada por la senora Esperanza Chavez Fonseca contra la Empresa Nacional de Telecomunicaciones, Telecom - en liquidacion.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Empresa Nacional de Telecomunicaciones Telecom - en liquidacion, que reintegre en sus labores a la senora Esperanza Chavez Fonseca dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificacion del presente fallo, como beneficiaria del "reten social", hasta la terminacion definitiva de la existencia juridica de la empresa.
  3. Cuarto. LIBRESE por secretaria la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.