JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 5, 2001

T-728 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Edgar Ernesto Rocha Vs. Inpec Medellin Y Otro·Respondent Sin Información

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida Y Salud. Retardo En La Determinacion De Fecha Y Realizacion Para La Practica De Cirugia De Tabique. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Retardo en programación de cirugía no urgente
  • Suministro de fecha exacta sobre intervención quirúrgica
Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia por retardo en programación de cirugía urgente
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la Sentencia del veinte (20) de noviembre de 2000, proferida por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Medellín - Sala Penal -.
  2. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela al señor EDGAR ERNESTO ROCHA y en consecuencia, ordenar al Instituto Nacional Penitenciario y Carcelario (Inpec) - Regional Medellín - , al director de la Cárcel Bellavista y al director del Hospital San Vicente de Paúl, fijar la fecha para la realización de la cirugía dentro de un término que no puede exceder de treinta (30) días calendario siguientes a la fecha de notificación de esta providencia.
  3. Tercero. LÍBRENSE las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.