T-349 de 2002
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería
✓Claimant Cedielo Moreno Suarez Vs. Inpec
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Omisión del INPEC en traslado de recluso para sustentar recurso de apelación
- Hecho superado
- Tercero con interés legítimo en tutela
- Efectividad de derechos fundamentales
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. REVOCAR los fallos de tutela del Juzgado
- Cuarto. (4) Penal del Circuito de Valledupar (Cesar) y la Sala Penal de Decision del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Valledupar (Cesar), por las razones expuestas.
- Segundo. DECLARAR que existe carencia actual de objeto por encontrarnos ante un hecho superado, no debiendose impartir orden alguna.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.