JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 13, 1996Full bench

C-613 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Virgilio Sandoval Torres

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 1372/68. Arts. 48 Y 94. Dec. 613/77. Arts. 54 Y 113. Dec. 2062/84. Arts. 82135 Y 152. Dec. 096/89. Art. 149. Dec. 097/89. Art. 107. Dec. 1212/90. Art. 150. Dec. 1213/90. Art. 109. Policia Nal. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derechos Prestacionales
  • Definición legislativa
Principio De Igualdad Ante La Ley
  • Mutación normativa
  • Naturaleza
Oficial Y Suboficial De La Policia Nacional
  • Liquidación asignación de retiro
  • Discriminación de hijos
  • Prima de subsidio familiar
Juicio De Constitucionalidad
  • Disposición derogada antes de nueva Constitución
Norma Derogada
  • Efectos futuros residuales
Transito Constitucional
  • Disposición derogada antes de nueva Constitución
  • Efectos disposición derogada antes de Constitución
10 topics · 12 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 3072/68. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 48Decreto 3072/68DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 94Decreto 3072/68UPHELD
Art. 113Decreto 613/77UPHELD
Art. 54Decreto 613/77DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 135Decreto 2062/84DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 152Decreto 2062/84UPHELD
Art. 82Decreto 2062/84DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 107Decreto 97/89ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 149Decreto 96/89ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 109Decreto 1213/90UPHELD
Art. 150Decreto 1212/90UPHELD
11 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. Primero. ESTARSE a lo resuelto en las sentencias Ndeg 72 de mayo 31 de 1990 y Ndeg 75 de junio 12 de 1990 de la Sala Plena de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, en cuanto se refiere a los articulos 149 del Decreto Ley 96 de 1989, 107 del Decreto Ley 97 de 1989.
  4. Segundo. Declararse INHIBIDA para conocer de los articulos 48 del Decreto Ley 3072 de 1968, 54 del Decreto Ley 613 de 1977, 82 y 135 del Decreto Ley 2062 de 1984.
  5. Tercero. Declarar EXEQUIBLES los articulos 94 del Decreto Ley 3072 de 1968, 113 del Decreto 613 de 1977, 152 del Decreto Ley 2062 de 1984, 150 del Decreto Ley 1212 de 1990 y, 109 del Decreto Ley 1213 de 1990.
  6. notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceJosé Gregorio Hernández Galindo
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.