C-176 de 2004
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández
✓Claimant Henry Martinez Marin
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Motivos de inconstitucionalidad obedecen a criterios objetivos
- Razones por las cuales textos acusados se estiman violados
- Ausencia de cargo de inconstitucionalidad
- Términos de comparación
- Requisitos en la carga argumentativa
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 675 de 2001.
Arts. 13 20 28 32 y 46 (ps.).
Regimen de propiedad horizontal.
Reconstrucción obligatoria edificio o conjunto.
Voto favorable del 70% de coeficentes de propiedad.
Desafectacion de bienes comunes no esenciales.
Mayoria calificada para decidir
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 675/01. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
- RESUELVE:
- INHIBIRSE para pronunciarse sobre la constitucionalidad de la expresion "setenta por ciento (70%)", consagrada en los articulos 13, 20, 28, 32 y 46 de la Ley 675 de 2001 "por medio de la cual se expide el regimen de propiedad horizontal".
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.