JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 22, 2000

T-776 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Sandra Milena Manosalbas Zuluaga

✓
Topic · hard data
Procedencia Excepcional De La Tutela Para El Cobro De Licencia De Maternidad. No Existen Elementos Probatorios Que Aseguren Violacion Del Minimo Vital. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por Tribunal Superior de Santa Fe de Bogotá, Sala de Familia, del 7 de diciembre de 1999, en el caso de Sandra Milena Manosalbas Zuluaga contra Compensar E.P.S., por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta sentencia.
  2. Segundo. Para los efectos del artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, el juez de origen hará las notificaciones y tomará las medidas conducentes para el cumplimiento de esta sentencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.