JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 8, 2003

T-687 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Jairo Benavides Vs. Penitenciaria Nacional De Acacias Meta

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud De Interno. Solicitud Practica De Tac Cerebral Y Valoracion Siquiatrica Prescritos Por Medico Del Penal. Relaciones Especiales De Sujecion Entre Reclusos Y Estado. Posicion Garante. Imprescriptibilidad De Las Penas. Llamado A Prevencion
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud Del Interno
  • Práctica de exámenes
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. Revocar las sentencias proferidas por el Juzgado Penal del Circuito de Acacías y la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Villavicencio y en su lugar conceder la tutela del derecho fundamental a la salud al ciudadano Jairo Benavides.
  2. Segundo. Confirmar las sentencias proferidas por el Juzgado Penal del Circuito de Acacías y la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Villavicencio, en el sentido de prevenir a la Dirección del penal de Acacías para que, en el menor tiempo posible, le fueran practicados los exámenes prescritos al interno Jairo Benavides.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaría General librar las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  4. Comuníquese, notifíquese, publíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.