T-666 de 2004
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Rodrigo Uprimny Yepes
✓Claimant Raul Alberto Rojo Ospina Vs. Coomeva
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Es necesario para garantizar accesibilidad económica
- Casos en que resulta irrazonable conceder prestaciones médicas
- Asunción de costos de vacunas
- Suministro de vacunas por EPS
- Criterios para la procedencia de tutela
- Respecto de quienes efectúan aportes al régimen contributivo
- Regla de incapacidad económica
- Reiteración de jurisprudencia
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia dictada por el Juzgado Decimosexto Civil Municipal de Medellín, el día 28 de octubre de 2003, en la que negó la tutela de los derechos fundamentales del ciudadano Raúl Alberto Rojo Ospina, en representación de su hijo Santiago Rojo.
- SEGUNDO. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.