JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 3, 1999

T-558 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Delfina Ariza Escobar Y Otra

✓
Topic · hard data
Pago De Licencia De Maternidad Por El I.S.S. Periodo De Cotizacion. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR las sentencias proferidas por el Juzgado 7 de Familia de Barranquilla de marzo 25 de 1999 y el Juzgado 13 Penal Municipal de Medellín de fecha marzo 25 de 1999, dentro de los procesos de tutela instaurados por las señoras DELFINA ARIZA ESCOBAR y MARIANA ELIZABETH VASQUEZ RAMIREZ, contra el Instituto de los Seguros Sociales.
  2. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela invocada por las demandantes, y en consecuencia inaplíquese el artículo 63 del decreto 806 de 1998, y por lo tanto, se ordena al Instituto de seguros Sociales, Seccional Barranquilla y Medellín, respectivamente, que, en un plazo de 48 horas siguientes a la notificación del presente fallo, proceda a reconocer y pagar la licencia de maternidad de las actoras de esta tutela, las señoras Delfina Ariza Escobar y Mariana Elizabeth Vásquez Ramírez.
  3. Tercero. Librar por la Secretaría General de esta Corporación, las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.