JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 11, 1998

T-792 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Ana Del Carmen Salazar Garcia

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Vida Y A La Salud. Der. A La Seguridad Social. Proteccion Especial A La Mujer Embarazada. Pago De Licencia De Maternidad Por Cajanal. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Licencia De Maternidad
  • Objeto
  • Aplicación ultra activa de norma
  • Pago oportuno
  • Pago por aplicación de norma existente al iniciarse embarazo
Mujer Embarazada
  • Protección constitucional especial
2 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR PARCIALMENTE el fallo proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Laboral del Circuito de Popayan del 15 de octubre de 1998, en cuanto tutelo el derecho fundamental de peticion.
  3. Segundo. Adicionalmente, TUTELAR los derechos fundamentales a la vida, salud y seguridad social de la senora Ana Carmen Salazar Garcia, para lo cual ordenara a la Caja Nacional de Prevision Social, CAJANAL E.P.S., que en el termino de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, contadas a partir de la notificacion del presente fallo, proceda a pagar la licencia de maternidad de la demandante, de conformidad con los argumentos expuestos en la presente sentencia.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaria General, librense las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.